The Proposal Guys Jon and BJ's proposal blog
  • Home
  • About
  • SP Website
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • SP Website
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Sharpening the summaries

10/9/2007

2 Comments

 
Posted by Jon
I’ve reviewed a couple of Executive Summaries for clients in different sectors lately. Both were well-written; they sought to restate the customer’s requirements succinctly, showing real insight, and they presented their respective organisations’ capabilities persuasively. Yet both fell short, for different reasons.
The first contained a list of bullets describing what claimed to be the compelling reasons to buy from the bidder concerned. Their approach would be “fully compliant”, their team had “proven experience”, they offered “unrivalled commitment” at senior levels and their solution would be extremely “cost effective”.

I was concerned. The list felt very “me too”: could I imagine a competitor submitting a proposal describing their non-compliant approach, delivered by an inexperienced bunch of recent graduates with little senior support, costing the earth?

But what really worried me was the lack of flow through into the remainder of the document. I applied a simple test, by searching on the key phrases from the stated ‘themes’. Lo and behold, they were notable by their absence. In nigh on 150 pages, the first mention of cost effectiveness came on page 127, and then only in an aside whilst discussing training. Management ‘commitment’ wasn’t referred to at all after the Executive Summary.

It seemed clear that the Executive Summary had been written after the fact, without a coherent overall vision for the proposal – rather like an artist painting a delicate watercolour of an eighteenth century rural scene, only to decide at the last moment to add in a pencil sketch of a spaceship in the far corner.

The second document fell into a slightly different trap. It was extremely well-written, creating empathy, offering great proof points and showing real differentiation. I fired through a few comments to the team, suggesting minor tweaks here and there. And then, not long after, I followed up with a second note on reflection:
By the way, do your three or four win themes really come through in this? There’s lots about the cool stuff you’ll do, but I’m not sure that the messages are quite as memorable as they might be. (Put another way, ten minutes on, I can’t remember what your themes are!).
If your strategy isn’t memorable – if the evaluators won’t read the book with your story clearly positioned in their minds – then it needs some further work and clearer articulation.
2 Comments
Barbara Esmedina
3/26/2016 04:47:33 am

Very nice commentary. I am thinking of creating a SmartDoc for executive summaries where a sales person could select sections targeted to specific industry pain and selling points. Since our RFP responses are in a database I could make sure the executive summary is cross-referenced to material in the proposal. You just gave me some good pointers to keep in mind!

Reply
Jon
3/26/2016 04:47:43 am

Glad it helped, Barbara. Your automated Exec Summaries sound like a cool idea – provided salespeople still understand that they own this vital section, and that you still make them contribute the opening content on the client’s needs!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Articles by Topic

    All
    APMP & Accreditation
    Interviews And The Panel
    Musings
    Processes & Best Practice
    Proposal Guys News
    Proposal Panda
    Proposal Training
    Purchasing Insights
    Word Play & Writing

    Authors

    BJ Lownie and Jon Williams are the co-founders of Strategic Proposals.

    Subscribe



    * Required fields

    SP News

    Strategic Proposals News

    RSS Feed

Picture
Website by Digital Media Design, Inc.