The Proposal Guys Jon and BJ's proposal blog
  • Home
  • About
  • SP Website
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • SP Website
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Save the last dance for me – 2

4/30/2008

2 Comments

 
Posted by Jon
I mentioned earlier in the year that there’s some interesting academic research on the correlation between the order in which candidates appear in a contest, and the likely result. I’m not sure whether it applies directly to the world of bids and proposals, but it’s certainly given me some food for thought.

Wändi Bruine de Bruin of Carnegie Mellon University has written a couple of papers now on the theme “Save the last dance for me”. She’s studied the outcomes of figure skating competitions, the Eurovision Song Contest (!) and reviewed other research into contests as varied as gymnastics, classical music and synchronized swimming.

The results aren’t entirely clear cut, but some strong patterns do emerge which tend to back up our “last or first” philosophy.

Broadly speaking, if candidates are judged via a step-by-step approach – that is, each individual entrant is scored and discussed immediately after they’ve taken their turn – then the data suggests that it’s better to go last:​
contestants who performed later in the sequence generally received better scores.
Judges compare each performance to its predecessors and “tend to overweigh the unique features of each new, focal, performance.” However, if an ‘end-of-sequence’ procedure is used, where “judges do not announce their scores until all contestants have performed”:
one may expect judges to give higher scores to contestants that are remembered better. Research on free recall suggests that first and last appearing options are more likely to be remembered.
Fascinating stuff: I’d love to see some research into bid presentations. Then again, proper planning, an effective content design process for the presentation, development of great collateral, a properly-managed rehearsal and careful choreography of the logistics all probably play a bigger part in improving your chances of success than the order in which you happen to present!
2 Comments
Roisin
3/26/2016 03:48:34 am

A comment not related to proposals – but this post brought back memories for me! I danced competitively for many years and this was often an issue complained loudly about.

To help offset it, the governing board issued a rule for championship-level team competitions, which was that all numbers should be put into a bag (like lottery balls) and drawn by an adjudicator. The number drawn would be the number at which the competition would start. E.g. if there were 5 teams and 3 was drawn, the order of play would be 3-4-5-1-2.

Sorted us out, I can tell you!!!!!

Reply
Jon
3/26/2016 03:48:45 am

Roisin – so who determines the team numbers? Is that drawn at random too?

It’d be interesting to know whether in that scenario, you’d want to be drawn immediately before or immediately after your main rivals – or whether you’d want to be kept well apart in the running order.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Articles by Topic

    All
    APMP & Accreditation
    Interviews And The Panel
    Musings
    Processes & Best Practice
    Proposal Guys News
    Proposal Panda
    Proposal Training
    Purchasing Insights
    Word Play & Writing

    Authors

    BJ Lownie and Jon Williams are the co-founders of Strategic Proposals.

    Subscribe



    * Required fields

    SP News

    Strategic Proposals News

    RSS Feed

Picture
Website by Digital Media Design, Inc.