<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Differentiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theproposalguys.com/2007/03/26/differentiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theproposalguys.com/2007/03/26/differentiation/</link>
	<description>Jon and B.J.&#039;s Proposal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:30:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://www.theproposalguys.com/2007/03/26/differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theproposalguys.com/2007/03/26/differentiation/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Good catch guy. Glad you&#039;re reading the posts and that they offer you a chance to exercise your editing/proof reading skills.

Your spotting this bit of &quot;grammatical creativity&#039;* on my part highlights a point I&#039;ve made within a previous post. That being, that an error will be overlooked by some (I fall into this group) and that it will be the equivalent to a reading &quot;speed bump&quot; to others (looks like you&#039;d fall into this camp guy. :-)

*And I would offer the following in regards to any errors within my posts. As this is a blog and not a formal proposal, and by it&#039;s** very nature rather informal, I tend to treat editing/proofing rather casually (driving my buddy Jon bit mad in the process!) and as readers who know me well will tell you, I can be pretty creative when it comes to spelling and rules of grammar. For our formal submissions we always enlist experts (you rock Rickie!) to ensure the document is correct and clean.

** This mistake (the apostrophe that shouldn&#039;t be there) was made intentionally just to tease you. Hope you spotted this one too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch guy. Glad you&#8217;re reading the posts and that they offer you a chance to exercise your editing/proof reading skills.</p>
<p>Your spotting this bit of &#8220;grammatical creativity&#8217;* on my part highlights a point I&#8217;ve made within a previous post. That being, that an error will be overlooked by some (I fall into this group) and that it will be the equivalent to a reading &#8220;speed bump&#8221; to others (looks like you&#8217;d fall into this camp guy. :-)</p>
<p>*And I would offer the following in regards to any errors within my posts. As this is a blog and not a formal proposal, and by it&#8217;s** very nature rather informal, I tend to treat editing/proofing rather casually (driving my buddy Jon bit mad in the process!) and as readers who know me well will tell you, I can be pretty creative when it comes to spelling and rules of grammar. For our formal submissions we always enlist experts (you rock Rickie!) to ensure the document is correct and clean.</p>
<p>** This mistake (the apostrophe that shouldn&#8217;t be there) was made intentionally just to tease you. Hope you spotted this one too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.theproposalguys.com/2007/03/26/differentiation/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theproposalguys.com/2007/03/26/differentiation/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>CD’s of their own music.....

As a proposal manager you should know that CD&#039;s is genative, i.e possessive. Plural of CD is CDs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CD’s of their own music&#8230;..</p>
<p>As a proposal manager you should know that CD&#8217;s is genative, i.e possessive. Plural of CD is CDs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

